Art painting, sculpture, photography, craft, poem, calligraphy, illustration, artisans, poets, writers, illustrators, gallery, event, musicians, actors, fashion designers

Home   Registration form   Advertising
 

Contemporary Artists

Past Artists

Events

Articles

Links

Sale

About

 
One Fine Art - Art Articles, understand art, publication of articles about art in Lebanon
One Fine Art - Art Articles, understand art, publication of articles about art in Lebanon





HotelsCombined.com - Hotel Price Comparison

 

Contemporary Arab Art – Legacy and Modernism – Omran al-Kaissi

CONTEMPORARY ARAB ART: PROOF OF EXISTENCE
(Extract)

It is not true that artworks, which depict most the Arab place and its splendor, affiliate the most to their Arab origins and carry the geographical identity that proclaims the belonging to the world of origin; otherwise the drawings of orientalists would have been the formal Arab art.

The issue of belonging cannot be reduced to direct and superficial graphical values, but can be firmly established as ideological constants which spontaneously emanate from the content of the artwork. Here we go to the creative interaction between the pillars of the triangle composed place, time and event.

Place is the space and context in which the movements of destiny and transformation are performed. Such movements do not pass through the place, present and future, without leaving an impact or planting imprints and signs. Some allude to what took place, others turn toward the happening. Time on the other hand takes the shape of positive mobile intentions and not that of waiting or motionless negativism, while the event is the code of interactions, existing and creatively produced, either as intellectual or visual texts.

We have not mentioned anything about the fittest and the best, for these are pure relative terms which the critic can use either to highlight this work or that, or to enrich them. We speak, it seems, about a creative movement that actually exists and not a latent one, specially that it comes up as an activity of several ones that are a must to be, or that accompany the development and growth of modern society, irrespective whether there exists intellectual interaction in this society or not.

The contemporary Arab art movement was created by virtue of the beginning of the contemporary growth of the modern political, social and cultural entities in the Arab World. A simile could be draw in here, once spring comes, flowers should bloom. It is not the blooming of flowers that causes spring. It is the necessary correlation between cause and effect.

The fact that the existence, growth and development of visual culture has been accompanied by crises and struggles within the Arab World itself, it has become mandatory for such expressionist culture to cope with all transformations taking place at the level of the society.

Had not the protest movement and revolution in Egypt taken place during the era of Mustafa Kamel, the pioneer Egyptian sculptor, Ahmad Mukhtar would not have carved Egypt awakening. In the same vein, if the 14th July 1958 Revolution in Iraq did not take place, the late Iraqi artist, Jawad Salim, 1920-1961, would not have sculpted his great sculptural memorial The Statue of Liberty. The event is an active motor of innovative sentiments, and the painting of artwork is totally affiliated to those events.

The same is true with regards to all intellectual developments and social and cultural reactions.

The expressionist language in the Arab art, during its academic stages, was a direct transcription of sentiments. The artist, according to Read, tried to express his feelings more than to record his observations. However, the huge succession and maybe the tragic succession of events in the Arab World, in no more than sixty years, stretching between the early forties and the end of the twentieth century have distorted the monitoring and expressing process, making it unable to establish a visual culture.
For this reason, I discussed amicably with my late friend, the great Palestinian artist, Ismail Shammout, the limitations facing his tragic painting that described the Palestinian catastrophe, the uprising and the resistance. But his dream was to initiate a register that might be transformed into a pictorial blog around people's life, those who were extracted from their land and began fighting with bare and with weapons to regain that land.

Also, when I was engaged in studying the works of my other Palestinian late friend Mustafa al-Hallaj, I realized that he, who possessed a symbolic expressionist language that reached at times the limits of surrealist rhythm, was seeking to set an equation concerning the future, the future of the struggle and not the future of co-existence. He drew an arrow pointing to an extremely important and crucial truth, that indicating the transformation of the visual culture into an edifice, taking the form of a bulwark, that amassed the creative capabilities. It was to allow every artist to present, in accordance with his plastic art or creative judgment, his case of confrontation.

Art in this particular Arab era is not a decorative luxury. It is a colliding consciousness that demolishes the existing negative aesthetic structure to build instead a state of definite affiliation to the visual culture, which produces a painting that debates the essence of affiliation to the Arab era, more than it represents a case of coexistence with the Arab place itself.

Accordingly, a question comes out from a set of interrogation marks. It concerns the role that an Iraqi artist, for example, should seriously play or practice, whether he is within his bloodied country or in the outside.

The expressionist school - the Baghdad School - created formal traditions and entrenched methods which drew their perspectives from ancient schools of the Iraqi art. Some of their prevailing subjects even discussed the individual concerns, mainly based on the Iraqi's crisis, pertaining to nationality and daily life, in addition to the city Baghdad, and its unique traditional features.

The same question repeats itself when we speak about the contemporary Palestinian art. It has witnessed an extraordinary shift from the descriptive to the foundational. This is because a new generation of Palestinian artists, who may be living and drawing in the West Bank and Gaza strip, or living inside the occupied territories, next to or along the contemporary Israeli art, or being part of the Arab or world diasporas, are presenting works that may be classified among the latest modernism and contemporaneity innovations. They have succeeded to get out of the nostalgia and descriptive circle to the square of hard confrontation working toward establishing another Palestinian visual culture. The simplest thus to be said about it is that it does not speak about the central foe as a claimed virtual one, but as a brutal, harsh and enforced presence that mandatorily calls for the search of the most modern means to challenge it. The latest Jerusalem Biennial gave very serious signals, via some functional synthetic works which astonished the Western world and via distinguished participations in Biennials or documentary exhibitions. The contemporary Palestinian art has proven then that it is responsive to the present times and a guardian of its standing.

There exist no negative descriptive attitudes. They are almost neglected in this collision time. Events have succeeded in imposing their influence on the plastic innovation, the form and the contents.

There exist in the experimental works of the Egyptian artists of today clear of the hegemony of the crisis of the Arab event on the art themes and ways of producing them.

Going deeper into the personal and general crisis in the contemporary Egyptian art shall push us toward liberating fully or partially the demons of its thoughts and of our queries. The same did the manifesto of the Eighth Biennial held in 2001 in Cairo under the motto "Spirit in the Soul… Spirit in the Body… and Spirit in God". The manifesto began its first steps in January 2001, they add up to the first threshold, the first point or cell within the third millennium journey of the communication world. The manifesto has in itself the seventh millennium journey of the Egyptian Nile Valley, since the signs of Philas, the Valley of the Kings, the Pyramids, the obelisks, the Triad Ammonite Deity, the unity of the creator in Akhnaton, the owner of divine unity, and the Egyptian cemeteries built for the next resurrection.

Consequently the manifesto of the seventh Egyptian millennium and the third world millennium declared that:

The spirit is in the soul
The spirit is in the body
The spirit is in God

The artwork is body, and this body communicates with and meets the viewer through the spirit and the soul, thus representing the link between the body and the soul. The recipient, upon viewing or meeting the artwork duplicates his self which is his body- the art body, thus collides with or rejects what he receives. Thence, there is the soul- the energy, which is the simulated junction between the art, which equates the body, and the recipient the spirit. Every time the retina of the eye pushes the image to the brain, it will be impossible to erase it, wherever we go. This is therefore the soul in the body.

This is the psychological and analytical vision of the contemporary Egyptian art. Its functional interpretations have reached through the preparatory condition among the young generation, its broadest scope. I lived this experience when I was a member of the Arbitral Committee in Alexandria Biennial of the Mediterranean Countries in the year 2000. This fact made us grant awards to a great number of those new artists.

But could we talk about other contemporary Arab arts independent of the crisis of the individual's human existence which the artist passes through, and independent of the crisis of the country in which he lives?

The plastic art movement in Egypt of the twenty- first century does not lean on a history rich and solid of artistic products and organic ocular culture. It has begun to invent its present, which is interactive with the event, and which interprets the present that insists on inventing the miracle of coexistence with the national, regional and Arab variables.
The national variables, whether the speedy demographic growth, the narrow cultural space separating the urban from the rural, the emergence of religious tendencies fighting or colliding with the majority of scientific or secular theses, have all exposed the visual culture to a colliding reality through which it should deal with using all its creative potentials.

We are therefore in an art situation ready for confrontation, equipped with defensive means of utmost need. This is the first time that a contemporary Arab art finds itself in the middle of a difficult founding mission. Therefore, it goes, most of the times, to the second circle of the regional variables, not to get support but to interact voluntarily with them, while it is in the midst of its internal challenges. Artist Ahmed Nawar, for example, draws the portraits of Fayyoum's personalities in order to enhance a status which we are obliged to acknowledge, being that of the typical originality of the Egyptian. But he turns also towards painting the Palestinian fields in a number of his works, leaning toward the conceptual expressionist consciousness. Along with all these works, he attaches a statement addressed to the Arab citizen briefing about his past as a soldier on the Suez Canal Front, and as a sniper in one of the advanced confrontation units, not paying heed to his official post and oblivious of what those who want the Egyptian artist a human without a past, may think.

The generations of young Egyptian artists express their bold ideas through artistic works that are synthetic, using concept methods. As such, they touch on the democratic concern, the environment and the crisis of the Egyptian, intrigued in his past and present, by two forces, equal and opposite in direction.

Discussing the innovative artistic case in Egypt may need a profound research and field surveys, something which is due for such a number and caliber of contemporary Egyptian artists.

IRAQI ART FROM ITS FOUNDING TO THE DIASPORA

We shall discuss the history of Iraqi creativity, taking into consideration the importance of the geographic place. Iraq has acted, over the passing of ages, as a garden of human innovation in art and architecture. Art, we should admit, is a spatial culture by excellence. Its development is the clearest sign of the city's development and progress. Iraq history, of no less than six thousand years B.C. - as ruins of Tell es Sawwan and Arido confirm- mandates reading the innovative sculptural vestiges, in view of the ancient Iraqi search for a divine pretext, to have sculpture and architecture of high spiritual value.

As such god Enki, god of water and knowledge, assigned creative duties only to his children; the divinity of writing to his grandson Nabu; building the city and transforming it into the most beautiful place in the world to his son Marduk. Thus was Babylon proud of its high tower. The other sons were also assigned with other intellectual missions.

Architecture was a cause and a substitute of sculpture in the land between the Two Rivers. Consequently, many archeologists and discoverers of ruins in Iraqi soil layers, considered that organic unity between architecture and sculpture originated from the strong divinity concepts in the land between the Two Rivers, i.e. the concept surging from the triangular: the city, the king and the individual.

The ancient Iraqi artist was vowed, for his creativity, to gods represented in the king. For this reason and around the third millennium B.C. it is found in the city of Uruk, named also al-Warka, the homeland of goddess Inanna the Lady of Sumerian Sky, the first names of sculptors and architects, by order of the temple's custodians themselves. That is, because the artist is the one who expresses the innovative civilizational desire of a god. In fact, he is the one who shall start developing the first cuneiform script on the round seals owned by the Temple, confirming in so doing his recording mission.

A great archaeologist like the late Taha Baqir, 1912-1987, shall make a triangle based on the principle of arches in roofing, the abstractionism in pointing to letters and the expressionism in sculpture, in order to form a bewildering civilizational picture, based on the effort of the first Iraqi artist.

The ancient Iraqi sculpture art as affirmed by the famous German archaeologist Julius Jordan, who discovered al-Warka ruins in 1912 and became director of the Iraqi Archeological Departments in 1931, is the basis for the human sculptural art in its condensed expressionist style. It began as dummies of unified specifications and ended as a homogeneous Parliavalian force, some sculpted on hard marble and others on calcareous stones. They are preserved since the start of the twentieth century at the Staatliche Museum in Berlin.

But that Iraqi artist, who was ahead of his time, would also realize that sculpture of the mass needs a comprehensive movement that provides it with time dimension and transforms it into a force that resembles the recipient and influences him. Consequently, cubism formations with large eyes indicate that the Rafidain human being comprehends the outside in its totality.

The old Iraqi art, during the Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian and Assyrian ages, was visual text depicting a historical event, seeking through which to achieve perpetuity and change, as expressed by the murals of the North West Palace of Ashurnasirpal the Second in Nimrud, located at present in the British Museum. However, the tendency of the ancient Iraqi artist toward abstractionism was expressed clearly in the second century B.C. through the murals painted during the reign of Commander Shamsi Ilo. Here, we receive the esoteric tendencies in the Iraqi art which were transmitted surprisingly to the two schools of Wasit and Baghdad in the Islamic Art.

Abou Jaafar al-Mansur, the second Abbasid caliphate, shall build in 154 H (762) A.D.), the round al-Zawra City, Baghdad, near an old monastery, next to a garden called Baghdan, located at the eastern bank of the Tigris River. He surrounded his palace with the palaces of his followers which were protected by the dwellings of ordinary people, without omitting the wall and the four gates.

It was a time of struggle between more than one party, where the powerful would get hold of the outstrips of the Abbasid State. When Haroun al-Rashid came to power, he decided to put an end to that by transforming the state into an Arab fabric. He realized the need to introduce artistic and architectural creation, then centered in Kufa or Wasit, where Yahya al-Wasiti lived and painted the most marvelous works ever seen. Painter Ghazi was a painter and an illustrious calligrapher. He taught the two children of Haroun al-Rashid, al-Ameen and al-Ma'mun. He was a very clever and rare colorist. He grouped a great number of creative painters around him, thus the arts of copying, drawing and composition prospered. The book in Baghdad became the most beautiful possession in the hands of the cultured. The era of eye enticement began.

Iraqi artists, painters, calligraphers and scribes, prevailed over the world of culture and knowledge during the Abbasid era. Their total number exceeded three thousands painters and calligraphers; some calligraphers even occupied ministerial positions like Ibn Muqlah and high positions like Ibn al-Bawwab.

Consequently, the first catastrophe was when the Moguls invaded Iraq and demolished Baghdad and Samarra, reducing to ashes Iraq's libraries transforming waters of Tigris River's into a blue ink.

The fact that the Iraqi innovative legacy vanished in a catastrophic manner, the Iraqis were psychologically affected, thus they became enclosed and introvert. Sufi movements and Sufi schools of thought spread with an amazing exaggeration in showing poverty and asceticism. The Baghdadi Sufi, Dalaf al- Shibli, 247-334H (861-946) A.D.), described his fellow Sufis by being a group of people whom God swept dunghills with their bodies. If you throw their bodies to the dogs they would not approach them. The idea of self-extinction means that there is no existence at all except for the reality of truth, which is the greatest creator, in which the smaller creator melts.

He will perish, then perish, then perish, then the extinction becomes the essence of existence.

In between the fall of the Abbasid rule and the extinction of the Iraqi innovative legacy on one side, and the advent of the modern times on the other, despite the Ottoman occupation of Iraq, several kingdoms, leaders and occupations vanished, but Iraq remained anointed with the perfume of its creativity. Iraqi art practiced by some Iraqi military officers who studied in Istanbul began to filter back to Iraq. At the outset of the twentieth century, people started to acquaint themselves with the paintings of Abdul Qadir al-Rassam, 1882-1952, Hajj Salim, father of the founder artist Jawad Salim, 1920-1961, also got acquainted with a large number of calligraphers. Art was a secret vein that fed the hearts of Iraqi talented artists. The period of commotion and transformations extending between the World Wars I and II provided an open space for reviewing the condition of the Iraqi art.

Fate decreed that a group of talented Iraqi artists like Jawad Salim, Faeq Hassan, Khaled Rahhal, 1926-1987, Mohammed Ghani Hikmat, Shakir Hassan al-Said, 1929-2004, Hafiz al-Droubi, 1914-1991 and others, should be in Iraq at the same time of, the indulgence of Europe in the World War, the fall of Paris and the threatening of London. Quite many of them were obliged to stop their art studies abroad and return home.

The paintings of those artists were influenced by great names in the painting world. However, a group of Polish artists, who fled their country and settled in Iraq before immigrating to America, drew the attention of Iraqi artists to the beauty of their capital, Baghdad, and to the Iraqi innovative legacy.

Thus an Iraqi awareness emerged and developed, pushing artists to get affiliated to the spirit of Baghdad city and the need to acquire the consolidated and creative commitment.

This founding generation of the Baghdad School, or the group of pioneers or enlightened, adopted for themselves a creative path based on:

1. Paying attention to the distinguishing characteristics of the Iraqi art across the ages. Thus, the Iraqi painting scoops from many sources, different but complementary, relies on the force of the Sumerian and Assyrian expressionism, takes from the color lyricism of the Islamic arts, from the unity and romanticism of architecture in Baghdad as well as other ancient Iraqi towns.

2. The academic consolidation of the generation wishing to learn art in view that the academic force is a mandatory composing nerve.

3. Liberating the imagination and the freedom of differentiation in art rhythms among the Iraqi artists.

4. Communicating and connecting with the outside world and getting acquainted with the latest technologies.

This generation has established his characterized Iraqi art edifice in such a way that the Iraqi expressionism has become one sign of combating all estrangement, if not the symbol of the fetched genuiness. This has been clearly expressed by the great Iraqi artist Jawad Salim in his large Parliavalian obelisk which still remains in the region of the Eastern Gate in Baghdad, the Freedom Monument.

Many trends and names would come to the limelight in Iraq and would interact prior to Iraq's occupation. Iraqi art schools at that time can be sorted as follows:

A. The Expressionist School in its symbolist orientations, represented by Jawad Salim, Nizar Salim, Khaled al-Jader, Mohammed Aref, Mohammed Ghani Hikmat, Faeq Hassan and a great number of their students.

B. The Impressionist School, represented by Hafiz al-Droubi, Faraj Abbo and Saadi al-Kaabi, knowing that the latter reverted finally to his own style, and a large number of other artists.

C. The Abstractionist School, represented by a group of modernist artists like Ismail Fatah al-Turk, 1934-2004, and tens of young artists who graduated after the seventies of the twentieth century.

D. The Literalism School, founded by the late Shakir Hassan al-Said and led by Qutaiba Shaikh Nouri, Jamil Hammoudi, Madiha Omar and others.

E. The symbolic trend, which focuses on the heritage symbols and the memory of the city.

F. Modernist trends, known through the works of Mehdi Moutashar, Fahmi al-Kaissi, Rafeh al-Nassiri and others.

Those trends, which prevailed prior to the occupation, confirm an astounding variation in the Iraqi art studios. The policy of the Modern Art Museum of Iraq was based on the acquisition of all sorts of experimental and the extended diversity of the modern Iraqi art collection, pointing to the wide spirit of experimental research of the Iraqi artist.

One of the most prominent features of Iraqi art is represented by the Iraqi Museum which comprises the treasures of the civilizations that ruled Iraq. However they are no more than 20 % of all vestiges discovered in Iraq, since the beginning of the archaeological missions to Iraq in 1875. The largest part of Iraqi antiquities exists in the museums of Berlin, Switzerland, Paris and London as well as at the University of Chicago and other universities across the United States of America. However, the Iraqi Archaeological Museum is one of the most prestigious museums in the world, scientifically partitioned, with an unequalled archaeological library. Needless to say that it was exposed to the dirtiest looting operation in history. The whole vestiges of the Akkadian history were transported to one state in the region, while that state destroyed most of what goes the Babylonian history in revenge of Babylonians who captured the kingdom of Jerusalem.

The second feature is represented by the Iraqi Modern Art Museum, which had its paintings stolen and sold for derisive prices in the Arab and world capitals, while the looters, unable to transport the millions of books and manuscripts of the Iraqi National Library, burned them in piles. Moreover, the acquisitions of the Islamic Museum in A'adhamiyah were also looted, knowing that the museum is the richest among all museums in the Islamic world.

Thus, ends the era of the Iraqi art which affirms the identity. Master artists were persecuted, children of some of them were abducted and released against financial and art ransoms, that was the case with the great artist Mohammed Ghani. The acquisitions of the Art Academy in Baghdad were demolished and teachers as well as students fled. Substitutes appeared, being forged paintings drawn by amateurs claiming that they were the works of the masters, next to trite paintings of superficial subjects.

Thus, art migrated. Iraqi artworks started to appear from outside Iraq pointing to Iraq open wounds. Iraqi artists at present, paint using the language of the current times whether abstractionists, expressionists, surrealists of affiliated to the Concept Art group. The most prominent modern Iraqi art blocs are as follows:

. The two Groups of Damascus and Amman. They have the expressionist rhythm leaning toward abstractionism in common, and their paintings maintain the Iraqi flavor, the palm trees, its swamps and the old Baghdadi streets.

. The Group of the Netherlands. A group of great artists like Ali Talib, Hassan Abboud and others. They lean toward abstractionism, but they played in addition a vital in the development of Cobra School created in the Netherlands and thus gained the admiration of their Dutch colleagues.

. The Group of London. Their main concern is a painting of cultural text or architectural construction, with a space movement, maybe influenced by the famous architect Zaha Hadid who is an Iraqi citizen from Mosul.

. The Group of the United States. The painting is an angry one, almost similar to a poster in the case of the Dearborn Group or to the eastern embroidery spirit of the Los Angeles Group. But some were skillful in airbrush painting or color spraying.

However, what we ought to stop at, concerning the Iraqi art, is the intellectual, cultural and historical development of the expressionist trend. We need to see the link between the formation of the modern political entity of Iraq and the accelerating progress of the overall cultural situation. The general expressionist trend of the Iraqi painting has been actually formed by the cohesive presence of the plastic Iraqi artist.

But from the womb of the resistance poem was born the position painting. The objective equivalent to the poem The Martyr's Day, written by al-Jawahiri after the assassination of his brother Jaafar al-Jawahiri in the upraising of al-Jumhuriyya Bridge in 1948, was The Leap painted by artist Shakir Hassan al- Said, though at a later date of the context of the poem.

Moreover, The Political Prisoner painted by artist Kadhim Haidar was more of a response to a political position which the Iraqi found no better way to address except through selected situations or symbols determined by their reactive sensual appearance and made visible by the power of linear design pointing to the composing skill of this artist.

Nevertheless, it was from the quick reactive responses to the daily events, that began to be formed, the core of the artistic Iraqi community of the first Baghdad School.

It is a school with no clear characteristic or proximity between the rhythms of the artists affiliated to it. It is more of an instinct call that has matured to prove first and foremost the existence of a parallel visual culture.

Most of the several writings about this advanced organizational achievement of the Iraqi art movement indicate that Jawad Salim was the pole, around whom the first organizational equation of the Iraqi art pivoted. This assembly was not preoccupied with any radicalist revolutionary or even reformist goals or objectives. It was a civil move to declare the existence of a parallel artistic movement that aims at mixing the West-inspired art, in view that most artists are graduates of Western colleges, and the art legacy being preserved by the artist's cohabitation with the exceptional city, Baghdad.

Some link between the admiration of Baghdad by some Polish artists, who lived temporarily in Iraq, and their admiration for inherited Iraqi texts, whether the ones of One Thousand and One Nights, or the texts and illustrations of the Maqamat of al-Hariri made by al-Wasiti.

But in all this, we should not overlook what the establishment of The Fine Arts Institute in Baghdad had of a pivotal role, and what the archaeological awareness had of an imprint, especially when the excavations were made and the personality of the National Museum of Iraq was crystallized. Number of artists was asked to help restore some of the works extracted from the consecutive historical layers of the civilization for the land between the Two Rivers (Mesopotamia).

The first expressionist generation was not negative toward the struggles and transformations in the rovalist Iraqi. On the contrary, the period between 1950 and 1958 witnessed several round tables that gathered painters, poets and critics. Even some of those meetings touched upon the general political concern, especially in 1956, during the tripartite attack on Egypt and the turmoil which engulfed the Iraqi streets and brought to the surface the latent will for change.

We found in that epoch an intelligent exploitation of the most fertile conditions in the popular Iraqi mind. The paintings showing Iraqi tired faces, construction laborers, women working in molding mud bricks and the fishermen of Tigris River; the paintings by artists Jawad Salim, Faeq Hassan, Hafiz al-Droubi and Ismail al-Sheikhly, were all a glorification of the genuine Iraqi worker whose misery was indicting evidence against the political ruling at that time.

The alleys of Baghdad were the source of misery and revolt. The impressionist Iraqi artist Hafiz al-Droubi painted the ancient alleys of Baghdad. He painted al- Sadria region which posed an extraordinary aesthetic formation, extracted its components from the zinc roofs that covered some bifurcations and shops of wheat and grains, where the stacking of goods had its inherited aesthetic feature. The artist was eager to express this internal upheaval lying under the apparent quietude of Baghdad's districts which were the refuge for laborers, toilers and teenagers carrying questions and pieces of chalk to draw graffiti on walls.

The ascending exploitation of the popular symbol and the inherited symbol began to grow along with the growth and development of the political events and the increase in the severity of clashes between the people and the ruling regime.

The Iraqi painter was not then distant from the national event. Following the 1956 uprising, the massacre of al-Kut city, in particular the region of Souk al-Shouyoukh, perpetrated by feudal lords, and following the ascending police oppression, the Arab symbol appeared in the Iraqi expressionist painting.

In the exhibition organized at the Teachers Training College in the first month of 1957, there were paintings around Port Said, the Algerian Revolution and Palestine. Many teachers and talented students interpreted the political awareness in a direct and unambiguous expressionist language.

Somehow the national feeling related to the national crisis began to unfold. The Baghdad School or the Pioneers Group or any other grouping, which leaned on the direct aesthetic aspects of the popular tradition, were not detained any longer from recording the reactive personal states of the daily stances of the artist. They began to transform the Iraqi expressionist painting to a position.

Art, as an intuitive force, breaks through unconsciousness and collides with it where, by way of a daily synchronization between the artist and the event, a web of organic relations is produced, rising to what we call the committing feature in art.

The Iraqi expressionist trend of the pioneering generation may have been more committed than the subsequent generations. The paintings of Jawad Salim, Faeq Hassan, Ismail al-Sheikhly, Shakir Hassan al-Said, Jamil Hammoudi, Hafiz al-Droubi and Khaled al-Jader may have formed a model of adherence to the daily expressionist language, where the smell of sweat, toil and tiredness were part of the themes of basic works, same was the language of deep relation between good people. The spirit of Baghdad, represented by the actual adhesion of houses and the close ties in its streets, lanes and markets, was automatically reflected on the artwork surface produced by a group of artists, who were fond of the essence of human relations connecting the city and the people.

The period between 1940 - 1958 was an important founding period in the life of the Iraqi art school. The appearance of art groupings, following the Baghdad School, like the Pioneers Grouping, al-Zawiya Group and others, enriched the Iraqi plastic art movement at the level of cultural interpretation of plastic artwork. Even some debates addressed the question of linkage between the painting and the homeland, from the perspective of the artist's capability to link himself with the national problem, a problem that was based automatically on the formula of the clash between the authority and forces opposing it.

The most dramatic event in Iraq's contemporary history was the surge of the 14th July Revolution in 1958, excluding of course the fall of Baghdad. Because that revolution, which laid the foundation of the Iraqi republican regime, opened wide cultural and creative horizons, to the extent that the educated person was much ahead the political authority and offered extended and crucial explanations for the early stages of the Iraqi revolution.

The sculpture of Jawad Salim at the Eastern Gate in Baghdad, which is a frieze comprising: a group of embossed sculptures arranged from right to left the way an Arabic text is read, according to the explanation of the prominent artist Jawad Salim, the comprehensive image of Iraq, starting from the movement of a horse surrounded by people, referring to the destruction by the masses of the statue of the British General Maude who occupied Baghdad, and King Faisal the First and the horses of both, passing through the stages of struggle, their challenge and martyrdom, and moving to the demolition of the prison's gate which rests in the middle of the monument. The left side relates parts from Iraq's history, up to the end of the sculpture where the Goddess of Fertility stands, a woman holding spikes in one hand and bearing a baby in her womb. This sculpture summarizes to a great deal the important phase of the Iraqi expressionism of struggling attitudes. This was the last of the said period especially that the great artist Jawad Salim died before his huge sculpture was terminated. Following that, and the political struggle between July 14, 1958 and February 8, 1963, when the regime of Abdul Karim Qassem was toppled, there came the rule of totalitarian parties where Iraq experienced a situation of huge moral and psychological destruction.

During that stage, a group of young artists met under the emblem of the modernizers and succeeded in presenting an exhibition of their works in Gulbenkian Gallery in Baghdad. This was the exhibition that exploded all academic trends and past Iraqi expressionism.

It was an abstraction exhibition par excellence. It loaded the painting with the enigmas of the ambiguous intellectual presence and made the title rest distanced from the work. The painting having The Neigh An Iron Horse as a title and the subject matter a burnt sponge stuck on the white space of the work, pointed to a distance of doubt that made the authorities realize that the era of artistic and innovative rebellion had emerged.

The defeat of June 1967 shook the Iraqi in the innermost of his conscience. Then the painting of anger appeared. Suad al-Attar painted the most wonderful of her angry paintings. Ismail Fatah al-Turk, Rafeh al-Nassiri, Rakan Dabdoub, Taleb Makki, Saleh al-Jumai, Ali Talib and Faeq Hassan executed works which indicated the degree of their overwhelming anger. That exploded with Amer Alobeidi in the form of heritage horses symbolizing the roots, knowing that the masters at that time, Faeq Hassan, Shakir Hassan al-Said, Khaled al-Jader, Jamil Hammoudi, Qutaiba al-Shaikh Nouri, Nuri al-Rawi and others, used their paintings to express their inherent feelings and interpretations in reaction to that overwhelming defeat. But what was founded at the hands of a generation of students during the sixties of the twentieth century and still studied at the Art Academy or Art Institute in Baghdad, was huge and crucial. It was reflected even in the behavior of some artists. Otherwise how could we explain the suicide of Iraqi painter Ibrahim Zair in Beirut, who joined at that time the Palestinian revolution trying to flee from the shame of his defeats. Also how could we explain the voluntary isolation of artist Saleh al-Jumai?

Iraqi expressionism found secret windows for itself to follow on the changes occurring in the world of visual culture. Maybe the literalism movement, founded by the late artist Shakir Hassan al-Said, could be considered one of the most important samples of those windows. It was presented along with a Sufi background, and supported by a unique language which transformed the painting into a psychological state that clings to the tails of time and space in Iraq in where awareness became one of the phenomena of true tragedy.

Yahya al-Wasiti, the Iraqi who bequeathed innovation

He is Yahya Ben Mahmoud Ben Yahya Ben Abil Hassan Koreha al-Wasiti. Koreha, being part of the name, led orientalist Pluche to believe that this painter was Armenian in his origins.

But whoever is aware of the important presence and innovation of the city of Wasit, originally a military outpost between the north and the south of Iraq in the seventh century of the Hejira or the thirteenth century A.D shall know quite well that al-Wasiti, being an artisan painter, was not distanced from the prevailing trend in that city, known for its industrial innovations at that time.
In his childhood, he focused his full attention to do something of meaning, learn it and excel in it at the hands of a skillful tutor. However records do not provide us with the name of al-Wasiti's skillful tutor. In Wasit itself, a painting school of certain creative standards was established. It had a special interpretation of the meaning of the visual culture presence and what it implied to the recipient of joy and awe at the same time.

Maybe al-Wasiti has contributed something new, which shall certainly appear through a square of:

First, the rise of the expressionist feeling, being reflected on the features of the central element in the picture. In other words, the object shall materialize through the reactively pictured statement of the center personality of the object. Speaking of Maqamat of al-Hariri in particular, being the only vestiges remaining to unfold the personality of this historical painter, the hero of the text, Abu Zayd al-Saruj around whom the story turned, was the central element and the lens through which the general condition of the whole event was reflected. That psychological expressionist method was considered a qualitative step in the Iraqi paintings during the middle Ages.

Second the creation of a civilization blend over a hybrid and new graphic flat surface. Al-Wasiti was very well acquainted with the Persian graphic art. He studied the flat surface formation of the human form. He knew the intellectual meaning of the distribution of elements, in their crisscrossing horizontal and perpendicular form, still with no depth. He got acquainted as well with oriental Christian art, being quite aware of the fiducially impacts on the composition, that was based on the state of display of purity and implied joy of the central personality of the Christian image which derived its reality from the Eastern Christian thought.

Al-Wasiti mixed those two trends with the style that prevailed in Wasit then, the plain painting- painting with the eye of a bird - and the focus on the integrated text of the object of the image.

Here we deduce one of two facts: first, the room for a genius interpretation by an educated printer, though no sources about the cultural and educational background of Yahya al-Wasiti. The second, the existence of a current, to which al-Wasiti was affiliated, aiming to renew the artistic situation and moving it from the mechanics of workmanship to the ingenuity of painting and coloring.

Third, the geographic, social and temporal context of the event to be painted. Such an important element was transferred to the graphic flat surface in its totality, to transform it into a visual statement, through which one can identify the social conditions and the spatial decoration, the social level, as well as the temporal for the place, which cannot be read clearly independently of the temporal context that affects it in full.

Fourth, with regards to the relation existing between the two texts, the written and the painted. If we compare al-Wasiti's style to that of other artists, in dealing with a written text to be painted or to paint its outstanding events, it is to be found that the painted text of al-Wasiti is not subordinated and isolated from the written text. The Maqamat of al-Hariri, which number more than fifty, all relate to the personality of Abu Zayd al-Saruj to the extent that some see in him a living normal person while others see a virtual human being.

Al-Wasiti focused, in the text which he decided to have it illustrated, on the central event. He chose the junctures of relevance from the text, making it easy for the reader of the anecdotes to complement his rhetorical textual knowledge with the pictorial text, with all the needed sequencing and rhetoric.

It is to be noted here that a Persian artist, Rida Abbas, in drawing the personality of Sheikh Sana'an within the book Bird's Language, no similar features are found in the several drawings. We find instead a written note pointing to Sheikh Sana'an to guide us to him. This is not needed for a painter of the standard of al-Wasiti who makes the personality of Abu Zayd al-Saruj appear with unified features, clear and familiar. It succeeds in crystallizing the visual sensitivity of the text.

The aforementioned actualized four pillars are crowned by an important feature that characterizes al-Wasiti's painting, the demonstrative function of the color. It is realized in this context the conscious capability of an artist who is proud of his artistically presence and who deals with color as an inspiration, of important symbolism. The golden color, which is the mark of splendor and glory, girdles the clothes worn by people of high rank, while embroidery, embellished with writings and invocations, appears clearly on the furniture. However the white color, which is the symbol of piety, remains within the space decorated by dark colors, in order to increase its visibility and splendor.

The color for al-Wasiti is not just a decorative means. It is an element of revelation and a tool to focus on the persons of the event and the situational meaning of the whole location. It appears that all that exists of chromatic relations is not separated from the revealing statement of the textual picture. With this chromatic meaning we come across a genius painter who elevates the pictorial text way above the mentality of the written text, to the extent that we almost come to believe sometimes that the written text is an explanatory annex to the pictorial text.

In addition, the contemporaries of al-Wasiti, who practiced the illustration of written texts, could use the chromatic style for decorative purposes only. They succeeded as such in creating pictorial decorative spaces. So it would not be strange to see some contemporary artists to al-Wasiti who also painted the anecdotes, such as Ahmad Ben Jalba al-Mousalli, died in 777H (1375 A.D.) or Abi al-Fadl Ben Abi Ishaq, who dated his paintings by the year 734H (1334 A.D.), or to see paintings with the signature of Ghazi Ben Abdul Rahman al-Dimashqi, born in 630 H (1232 A.D.), who excelled in spatial decoration embellished with Kufi calligraphy. Al-Wasiti taught us, over and above, to be affiliated with our artistic innovation and to record it, as part of our history. He used not to forget to mention his full name, being the artist who executed the artwork, as well as the date and place.

In addition, he was a clever technician in the preparation and mixing of colors. Maybe what Ibrahim Juma'a wrote, in the sixth volume of al-Thakafa Magazine during the sixties of the twentieth century, about the method of preparing the black color by way of burning caphor leaves and mixing them with mustard oil, then using the mix to draw, with the help of a fine reed, the facial features, needs further technical clarification.

We need to clarify, by way of our experience, that many ancient Iraqi calligraphers used to produce black ink, through burning wool and mixing its ashes with some drops of a cow gallbladder, then adding egg albumen together with soot powder, extracted from the bottom of stoves.

The reason of this technique is that mustard oil used to be inexistent in the spice markets of Baghdad, Basra or Wasit, while other colors were extracted from their plant or rock sources.

The pericarp of the tender walnut fruit may produce, when not ripe yet, a brown color. If boiled with, a small quantity of water, some Arabic gum and the green clover may produce, if pounded and crushed well, a juice transformable into a tempora when a small quantity of honey is added to it.

The artist, who lived in the middle Ages and excelled in his creation, could be considered a high level and skilled in industrial and artisanal work, in as much as encyclopedically cultured. As such, he was not concerned in drawing only, but also in the whole process of his art world, starting with colors and ending with the tools used.

Al-Wasiti himself was a true peer for the text writer. For that reason he was his partner in the final manuscript, which was not just an intellectual written text to be read but a visual text as well that provided the most profound approach to the written text. Consequently, the revealing of the important role of al-Wasiti might serve as a prelude to understand the founding meanings of the first Iraqi school in the drawing art.

Have we not said that Iraq is a country where the past is more vivid than the present and that the strength of the roots would make us more optimistic that the garden would bloom once again.

One Art Articles - Main

 

 

.



Contemporary Artists | Past Artists | Events | Articles | Links | Sale | About | Registration Form | Advertising | Home

Design, layout, & graphics are copyright © 1997-2017 OneFineArt - The Art for Everyone. All artworks are
copyrighted by their respective artists & owners. Do not use any graphics or artworks without permission.